Cosmology
| Republican
Economy | In the Light
of Benazir Buttho's Assassination | A Paradox?
| Thank you,
but no, thanks | The first
Secularist | Ernest
Hemingway | Our
constitutional Dilemma | Dairy Maid
Economy | Cold War
| Archeology
from the Future
Perplexities
|
Her breakfasts were known to be splendid,
and prepared with enough pepper to make me cry. At the first fiery bite
I said, bathed in tears: Tonight I won’t need a full moon for my
asshole to burn. Don’t complain she said. If it burns, it’s because you
still have one, thanks be to God.
|
Gabriel Garcia
Marquez
|

Cosmology
When the
Hubble variable was discovered in 1926 it had a value of 500 kilometers
per
second per megaparsec. During the past halfcentury this variable has
gradually
declined to 50.3 kilometers per second per megaparsec. The radius of
the
universe is inversely proportional to the magnitude of this variable.
Accordingly
the universe is expanding by a factor of 100 per century. Dividing this
factor
into the above ratio discloses that the expansion began here on earth
in 1,015
AD. during the dark ages.
Halton Arp (Extragalactic
Astronomy,
Science, 17 Dec. 1971, vol.
174, p. 1189)
up
Republican Economy
Darkness is
cheap and Scrooge liked it.
Charles Dickens (1812-1870)
up
In the Light of Benazir Buttho’s Assassination
The law in Pakistan makes going
to
school mandatory. Isn't that so everywhere? Not quite! In Pakistan the
state
doesn't spend a dime on public schools. Therefore a large proportion of
the
children, who incidentally come mostly from the poorest and
disenfranchised,
observe the law by going to Koran schools, so called
Madrasahs, where they
literally learn nothing but chanting the Koran in a foreign language.
Rarely
has observing a beneficial law perverted a good intention to such
extreme
degree. Pakistan is a nuclear power! Can you imagine what this may
mean, one
day? Don't imagine! It's already happening.
m.s.
up
A Paradox?
War
is the father of all and the king of all; Homer was wrong in saying:
"Would that strife might perish from among gods and humans!" He
did not see that he was praying for the destruction of the universe;
for, if
his prayer were heard, all things would pass away (Heraclit
535-475 BC.). This is true:
these days
many more patients survive in our ER units because of the emergency
techniques
developed in the Vietnam war than there had been soldiers killed in
Vietnam.
m.s.
up
Thank you, but no,
thanks
I have
received your new book (A
Discourse on Inequality, by Jean-Jacques
Rousseau) against the human
race, and thank you for it. Never was such cleverness used in the
design of
making us all stupid. One longs, in reading your book, to walk on all
fours.
But as I have lost that habit for more than sixty years, I feel
unhappily the
impossibility of resuming it. Nor can I embark in search of the savages
of
Canada, because the maladies to which I am condemned render a European
surgeon
necessary to me; because war is going on in those regions; and because
the
example of our actions has made the savages nearly as bad as ourselves.
Voltaire (1755)
up
The first Secularist
And when you
pray, you shall not be as the hypocrites are: for they love to pray
standing in
the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen
of men.
Verily I say unto you, they have their reward. But you, when you pray,
enter
into your closet, and when you have shut your door, pray to your Father
which
is in secret.
Matthew, 6:5-6
up
Ernest Hemingway
He became the
most famous writer of the century, but it was for everything except
writing.
He
killed at least one each of every animal in Africa. He caught at least
one each
of every big fish in the sea. Hemingway's lethal exploits were written
up in
the new picture magazines Life
and Look, with
photographs taken
on the site of the massacre. Often Hemingway contributed the pose
himself. He
didn't actually kill every bull in Spain, but he liked watching. He
wrote a
book about it. He used simple sentences. He said the simple life of the
instincts was better than too much thought.
In
1959 Hemmingway was back in Spain to watch the bulls bite the dust. Or
else he
was out in the Gulf Stream killing fish. Or else he was in Africa
killing
animals again. Hemmingway was always killing something. He called it an
appetite for life.
Hemingway
lived in Key West, in Cuba, and in all the world's best hotels, always
talking
about the good wine and the good food and the good season. But he no
longer
wrote good books, although the Nobel Prize followed one of his worst,
The Old
Man and the Sea.
In
Africa, on the hunt for the few remaining animals he had not already
killed,
Hemingway had a plane crash and woke up to read his own obituaries. His
next
move was to have another plane crash. When he recovered from that one
he went
fishing. He could never have enough of killing living things.
Finally
he did it to himself, with a shotgun.
Clive James
up
Our constitutional Dilemma
A: As a
historian I have an idea what the originators of the electoral college
may have
had in mind - look at it in a context of horse drawn carriages and
smoke
signals as the fastest means of communication. But the election of the
President of the United States is the election of the Union's head of
state: he
is everybody's president not just for the people in Milwaukee,
Delaware, and
Rhode Island. And if Missouri needs to speak for herself, she has her
governor
and local senate to do so. The President of the United States is my and
every
individual's president regardless how such individual may feel for his
or her
state. The electoral college has one and one purpose only, to elect the
President, therefore it is obsolete and self-defeating in a time when
the
popular majority of all individuals can be known in the same night,
even before
closing the polls. In fact the elector's legal right to overrule the
figures
from his constituency is a slap in the face for everything democracy is
standing for. The electoral college has the function and capacity to
introduce
bias in an affair where only the figures should count. So why do we
continue to
cling so tenaciously to this archaic institution? We don't go to work
on
horseback anymore!"
B: Different
people elect presidents for different reasons, so do different groups
of people
...
A: ... are you
trying to tell me that the people in Tennessee have a different agenda
when
voting for a President than the people in California, hence you need
the
electors to put things right? Well, hard luck buddy, if the interest of
the
Californians is outweighing yours in sheer numbers, then there must be
a reason
for it, a reason which figures in the Union's gross annual income.
Their
interest simply deserves to enjoy the priority as mirrored in the
majority
figures.
B: Hey! Just
imagine the whole world would be one big happy family under one state
with
popular majority rule, then the two groups with the lowest income, the
peasant
populations in China and India would be the ones pulling the weight and
totaling
out every other voter group - is that really what you want?
A: Why, have they
no right to be represented?
B: Sure, but
do you really think their interests weigh as much as the exponentially
more
productive interests of some much smaller groups? And this is limiting
the
argument only to the economic aspect. We even don't go to the cultural
ramifications. Popular democracy can get us into the strangest places,
my
friend ... ."
m.s.
up
Dairy Maid Economy
In 1995 a
British politician described the most recent changes in our economy as
turning
the under-educated labor-force from needless but decently paid jobs
into
subsidized redundancies, meaning that this actually would reduce the
costs for
the taxpayer. But his facial expression and a sudden pause between two
phrases
was a dead giveaway for what this means in terms of human dignity and
motivation. And the reasoning is actually wrong. Those people did not
receive
their income from taxes, but from redundant branches of an admittedly
obsolete
industry which indeed meant smaller profits for the money lender, but
was still
capable of generating enough profit to balance the payroll. So their
income
contributed to the most important factor of any economy: domestic
purchasing
power. The only legitimate fuel of any economy, and it didn’t cost the
taxpayer
a penny. On the dole they contribute nothing, and we pay for it. In
other
words, they are laid off for the interests of an other minority group,
which
has the financial muscle to force their fellow human beings into
redundancy for
no better reason but to increase their own profits. And they dare
telling us,
Marx is passe?
m.s.
up
Cold War
It was a new
concept and given the most recent developments in our blessed
post-cold-war
world, a successful concept. That it should lead to one side's
"victory" was a flaw in the execution. It left behind a world which
is clearly less manageable and less secure with numberless hot little
wars
flaring up everywhere.
m.s.
up
Archaeology from the Future
In a distant
future - say, two millennia from now - it should be easy to date my
skeletal
remains. I was born when the world powers were testing hydrogen bombs
in the
open atmosphere; so every bone from that period contains deposits of
strontium,
a fallout product of nuclear explosions. Younger people, born in the
seventies
and later, will be recognizable by their dentures - there have been
significant
advances in dental care. (My childhood was still marred by black
spotted teeth
and gaps in the incisors.) An other clue are new materials in
hip-replacements.
m.s.
©
- 1/15/2008 - by michael sympson,
1,700
words, all rights reserved